pmhblank.gif (3259 bytes)

PMLOGO.jpg (2806 bytes)

thebanner.jpg (12825 bytes)

lcorner.gif (165 bytes) ms.gif (2755 bytes) blank56.gif (973 bytes)
ctp90.gif (923 bytes)
.  

 

THE HISTORY OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

By Loren A. Rolak, M.D.

The history of multiple sclerosis (MS) is a detective story
spanning more than a century. Many clues have been pieced
together, but only now are answers emerging. To appreciate
why the trail to a solution has been so long and hard, it is
necessary to understand what we scientists now believe to be
true about MS.

Multiple sclerosis is one of the most common diseases of the
nervous system, afflicting people of virtually all ages around the
world, although it has a special preference for young people,
especially women, and for those who grew up in northern
latitudes.

We believe MS involves a genetic susceptibility, but it is not
directly inherited. It usually causes sudden neurologic
symptoms including vision loss, paralysis, numbness, and
walking difficulties. The symptoms can be diverse and
confusing, often coming and going without any pattern, making
it difficult to diagnose, even today.

The symptoms appear because nerves in the brain and spinal
cord lose their ability to transmit signals. Myelin, a complex
substance that surrounds and insulates nerve fibers, is essential
for nerves to conduct electricity and carry out their function.
Myelin is destroyed in MS.

In MS, cells and proteins of the body's immune system, which
normally defend the body against infections, leave the blood
vessels serving the central nervous system, pour into the brain
and spinal cord, and destroy myelin. The specific triggering
mechanism which causes an immune system to attack its own
myelin remains unknown, although a viral infection on top of an
inherited genetic susceptibility is a leading suspect.

The discovery of MS
Until the early years of the 19th century, physicians relied on
superstition, hearsay, and the wisdom of the ancients to care
for the sick. Medical ideas were not scientifically tested. Even
so, physicians were sometimes good observers and we can
identify people who undoubtedly had MS from descriptions
written as long ago as the Middle Ages. MS has always been
with us.

Once the scientific method took hold in medicine, MS was
among the first diseases to be described scientifically. The
19th-century doctors did not understand what they saw and
recorded, but drawings from autopsies done as early as 1838
clearly show what we today recognize as MS.

Then, in 1868, Jean-Martin Charcot, a professor of neurology
at the University of Paris, who has been called "the father of
neurology," carefully examined a young woman with a tremor
of a sort he had never seen before. He noted her other
neurological problems including slurred speech and abnormal
eye movements, and compared them to other patients he had
seen. When she died, he examined her brain and found the
characteristic scars or "plaques" of MS.

Dr. Charcot wrote a complete description of the disease and
the changes in the brain which accompany it. However, he was
baffled by its cause and frustrated by its resistance to all of his
treatments. These included electrical stimulation and
strychnine--because this poison is a nerve stimulant. He also
tried injections of gold and silver, as they were somewhat
helpful in the other major nerve disorder common at that
time-syphilis.

A prisoner of biotechnology
In the last decades of the 19th century, the leading physicians
of the world came to understand that MS was a specific
disease. MS was recognized in England by Dr. Moxon in
1873, and in the United States by Dr. Edward Seguin in 1878.
By the end of the century, much of what can be learned about
MS from careful observation was known: that the disease is
more common in women than men, that it is not directly
inherited, and that it can produce many different neurological
symptoms.

But observation can go only so far. Knowledge of MS could
not advance without deeper understanding of biology and
better research tools. The very existence of the immune system
was unknown. Doctors of the time assumed the same disease
rarely struck the same person twice because a disease "used
up" the materials in the body it needed to live, much the way
crops use up soil nutrients and die unless they are rotated.

In the 19th century, scientists first learned that bacteria cause
many diseases. As the new century began, they discovered
even smaller organisms, viruses, and developed techniques for
growing and studying bacteria and viruses in the laboratory.

In 1906, the Nobel prize for medicine was awarded to Dr.
Camillo Golgi and Dr. Santiago Ramon y Cajal, who perfected
new chemicals to enhance the visibility of nerve cells under the
microscope. Equipped with this new technology, Dr. James
Dawson at the University of Edinburgh in 1916 performed
detailed microscopic examinations of the brains of patients
who had died with MS.

Dr. Dawson wrote a description of the inflammation around
blood vessels and the damage to the myelin with a clarity and
thoroughness which has never been improved upon. But so
little was known about the brain's function that the meaning of
these changes could only be guessed at.

Complexities—and an unrecognized breakthrough
In the decade after World War I, MS research grew more
complex. Abnormalities in spinal fluid were noted for the first
time in 1919, though their significance was a puzzle. Myelin,
which had been discovered in 1878 by Dr. Ranvier, was
studied intensively under the microscope and the cell that
makes myelin, the oligodendrocyte, was discovered in 1928.

The first electrical recording of nerve transmission, by Lord
Edgar Douglas Adrian in 1925, established techniques needed
to study the activity of nerves and launched a series of
experiments to determine just how the nervous system works.
Ultimately, six Nobel Prizes were awarded for these studies.
The resulting knowledge included clarification of the role of
myelin in nerve conduction and a realization that demyeli-nated
nerves cannot sustain electrical impulses.

At this time, scientists suspected that some form of toxin or
poison caused MS. Because most MS damage occurs around
blood vessels, it seemed reasonable that a toxin circulating in
the bloodstream leaked out into the brain, even though no
researcher could find a trace of it.

Just before World War II an important breakthrough
occurred. An animal model of MS was developed out of
research on vaccines. It had been known that people
vaccinated against viral illnesses, especially rabies, sometimes
developed a disease resembling MS. It had been assumed that
this occurred because the virus in the vaccines was not
completely inactivated.

In 1935, Dr. Thomas Rivers at the Rockefeller Institute in
New York City demonstrated that nerve tissue, not viruses,
produced the MS-like illness. By injecting myelin he knew to
be virus-free into laboratory animals under the proper
conditions, he could induce their immune systems to attack
their own myelin, producing a disease very similar to MS.

This laboratory animal form of MS, called experimental allergic
encephalomyelitis, or EAE, would later become an important
model for studying the immunology and treatment of MS. In
fact, it paved the way to modern theories of autoimmunity, for
it demonstrated how the body can generate an immunologic
attack against itself.

But most doctors in the 1930s were still analyzing toxins or
checking blood circulation in MS. The importance of EAE to
MS was virtually ignored.

Instead, a flurry of experiments in lab animals demonstrated
that blocking the blood supply to the brain sometimes caused
myelin to die. The damage looked a bit like MS. Doctors
wondered if MS was caused by circulation problems, and they
tried therapies to stimulate blood flow including blood thinners
and drugs to dilate blood vessels. X-rays were also used to
treat MS, although more for their novelty than for any sound
scientific reason.

It would be many years before the essential similarity of EAE
and MS was understood and a link between the immune
system and MS was forged.

1940s: The coming of the National MS Society...
World War II focused the energies of the scientific world on
new technologies. New methods and new understandings
emerged from wartime research efforts in many areas. In
1943, for example, the actual composition of myelin was
determined. Then when peace came, one of the most
important catalysts in the fight against MS was created. The
National Multiple Sclerosis Society was founded in 1946.

Sylvia Lawry, an extraordinary ordinary citizen whose brother
suffered from the disease, placed a classified advertisement in
The New York Times asking to hear from anyone who had
recovered from MS. But all the letters she received came from
others who also sought help and hope.

Instead of being discouraged, Ms. Lawry mobilized a group of
friends and advisors, including some who had answered her
ad. From this the National MS Society was formed to
promote contacts among neurologists around the country who
treated MS and to raise money to fund a search for answers.

A promising start
With remarkable foresight, the very first research grant from
what was then called The Society for the Advancement of
Multiple Sclerosis Research was awarded to study the
immunology of MS--the relationship between the body's
immune defense system and the impact of MS on the central
nervous system (the brain and spinal cord).

This 1947 grant went to Dr. Elvin Kabat at Columbia
University. He subsequently identified abnormal immunologic
proteins in the spinal fluid of people with MS. In lab tests,
these proteins appeared as patterns known as oligoclonal
bands. Oligoclonal bands not only proved to be a valuable
diagnostic test for MS but also a major demonstration that MS
and the immune system are connected.

A world-wide research effort begins
In the next few years, the renamed National Multiple Sclerosis
Society awarded grants to scientists in 17 countries in all fields
of medicine, pushing forward research that ranged from
description to diagnosis and from finding a cause to searching
for a cure.

Recipients of early National MS Society grants included Dr.
Jonas Salk for studies on the immunology of MS and Dr. Rita
Levi-Montalcini, who later won the Nobel Prize for describing
proteins that help nerve cells grow and stay healthy.

A new major partner
In 1950, in a bold move, the new Society persuaded Congress
to establish a special section of the National Institutes of
Health. With the birth of what is now called the National
Institute for Neurologic Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), the
movement against MS gained one of its most essential
partners. NINDS and the National MS Society--along with
members of the International Federation of MS Societies,
which was also founded by Sylvia Lawry in 1967, have
supported virtually every major MS study from that day to
this.

New research directions
An unforeseen consequence of World War II was the
availability of medical information on a huge population of
young men who had served in the military. For the first time,
the uneven distribution of MS was appreciated. A strong
geographical gradient was apparent, showing that the
incidence and prevalence of MS increased steadily as one
moved northward or southward away from the equator.

Meanwhile, the immune system became an object of intense
scientific study. Special white blood cells called B cells were
discovered and shown to produce proteins called antibodies.
It was soon learned that antibodies neutralize viruses and other
infectious agents. Antibodies are also capable of attacking the
body's own tissues.

There were more studies of EAE. For example, experiments
showed that EAE could be transmitted by transferring T cells
(another type of white blood cell) from an affected animal to a
well one, showing that it was an autoimmune disease. And at
last, scientists recognized that EAE was in many ways an
excellent model of human MS.

But, beyond the world of research, doctors who treated
people with MS in the 1950s continued to suspect the cause
lay in impaired blood flow, so circulation stimulators
dominated treatment. These therapies were used without
controlled studies to track the results, called clinical trials, so
no reproducible or valid information could emerge about their
effectiveness.

Breakthroughs expand knowledge but increase
confusion
In 1953, one of the major medical breakthroughs of the
century occurred with the Nobel Prize-winning description of
the structure of DNA by Francis Crick and James Watson.
The way in which genes control biologic functions became
clearer--including how viruses work and how the immune
system is regulated.

Additional studies on nerve conduction showed how chemicals
generate electricity as they flow through channels in nerve
endings. And myelin was broken down into its components,
isolating the basic protein suspected to be the target of the MS
attack.

This era saw scientists striking out on many different paths,
testing many possibilities, and formulating many new theories,
but without uncovering a clear unifying thread to direct MS
treatment. Meanwhile, doctors continued to struggle with the
challenge of diagnosing and treating people with MS. The
emerging scientific complexity of MS confused, rather than
clarified their challenge. So while much was being learned,
research could give doctors very little guidance on what was
best for their patients.

Chaos addressed by the NMSS
Some in the MS community were disaffected by this situation.
They felt the MS movement should concentrate solely on
services for people living with MS. Perhaps the mystery was
too complex to be solved. The National MS Society, which by
1960 had established 114 local chapters to provide services
for individuals and families, kept up the scientific assault.

To bring order to the medical management of MS, the Society
funded a panel of experts, headed by Dr. George
Schumacher, to draw up standard guidelines for MS diagnosis.
Although they have been refined since, these standards are still
in use today. At the same time, a rating scale for determining
the level of disability and the parts of the nervous system
affected by MS was refined by Dr. John Kurtzke.

Having standards helped doctors make earlier, more accurate
diagnoses and allowed research on treatments to be
conducted with greater reliability.

The first valid scientific trial
The year 1969 saw the first successful scientific clinical trial of
a treatment in the history of MS. A group of patients who
were having exacerbations-or acute attacks of their MS--were
given the steroid ACTH. Their experience was compared to
that of a similar group who received a placebo (an inert
look-alike). The ACTH proved superior in speeding recovery.
This primitive intramuscular steroid therapy would give way to
the modern steroid therapy still in use today for acute
exacerbations.

This trial used the new rating scales and diagnostic standards
to ensure that results seen in the treated and untreated groups
could be compared accurately. The way to solid progress was
now open.

1960-1970
During the 1960s, scientific research into the cause of MS
came to focus on two main lines of inquiry which are still being
explored today.

The first emerged from a finding about the immune system.
White blood cells that react against myelin, specifically against
a major component called myelin basic protein, were
discovered in both EAE and human MS. This led scientists to
consider the possibility that MS involves a direct
immune-system attack on myelin.

The second idea came from another finding. Studies showed
that people with MS have altered antibodies against viruses.
This revived the older thinking that MS could be caused by a
virus. But rather than a viral infection directly damaging the
central nervous system, viruses might alter the immune system
and trigger it to damage myelin.

These two ideas remain closely mingled today: MS may
combine features of both an infectious and an autoimmune
disease.

1970-1980
Understanding of immunology was enhanced as doctors
learned to prevent the immune system from rejecting
transplanted foreign organs. Insights from successes in
transplantation, as well as intensive studies of EAE, further
linked MS to the part of the immune system that makes tissues
compatible with each other.

In 1978, the first CAT scans were performed on people with
MS. And, in 1979, a Nobel prize was awarded for
development of this powerful new tool. CAT scans use a
computer to link a circular array of x-ray images to create
detailed pictures of the human brain. The diagnosis of MS was
further improved with the introduction of tests called "evoked
potentials" which measure nerve conduction.

Scientific research began to yield direct therapeutic dividends
as well. Steroids to suppress immune activity were now widely
used to treat MS attacks, and the first small studies were
performed using interferons, substances that modulate the
immune system. The first studies of beta interferon for MS
began at the end of the 1970s.

In 1970, scientists studying EAE in lab animals suspected that
some myelin protein fragments prevented the disease and
actually seemed to protect the animals. Spurred by this finding,
they synthesized a mix of protein fragments and used it to treat
first animals and then humans with MS. The product was
named copolymer 1 (and is now manufactured under the name
Copaxone®).

1980-1990
Scientists began to understand in more detail how white blood
cells are activated by foreign substances to mount attacks.
One activating trigger can be a virus.

Doctors also learned that parts of some viruses look so much
like normal human tissue that white blood cells will
inadvertently attack them when they attack the virus. This is
yet another mechanism by which viral infections could lead
indirectly to destruction of myelin.

At about the same time, the white blood cell type that causes
the actual damage to myelin in MS was finally identified. It is
the macrophage (or "Big Eater" in Greek).

The first studies of identical and fraternal twins begun in this
decade extended knowledge about the genetics of MS. And
psychosocial and mental health issues, as well as the cognitive
changes occasionally caused by MS, began receiving long
overdue research attention.

CAT scanning was surpassed by a new technology, the MRI
scan, which showed the brain in greater detail. The first MRI
scans of people with MS were performed in 1981 by Dr. I. R.
Young, in England. By 1984, it became apparent that the MRI
could actually see MS attacks within the brain, including many
which did not cause any symptoms. MRI changed the basic
understanding of MS, for by 1988 sequential MRI scans
proved that MS is a constant, ongoing disease even though
symptoms may appear only sporadically.

The 1980s may legitimately be called the "treatment decade" in
MS. There was an explosion of clinical trials. Guided by the
National MS Society, scientists reached a consensus on the
design and conduct of research for new treatments. For the
first time the emphasis could shift away from palliation, where
the aim is to help people with MS feel as good as possible for
as long as possible, and go instead toward attempts to control
or cure the underlying MS.

Major clinical trials conducted during this decade led to
approvals of the first drugs in history shown to affect the
course of this disease.

1990-1996
Today, the therapeutic momentum is sustained and growing. In
1993, Betaseron® was approved by the FDA to reduce the
severity and frequency of attacks. In 1996, Avonex® was
approved to slow the development of disability and reduce the
severity and frequency of attacks. By the end of the year a
third drug that has a proven effect on the natural course of
MS, Copaxone® (known generically as glatiramer acetate for
injection), was approved for treating relapsing-remitting MS. It
will be launched in 1997. At last, decades of research are
being rewarded with some practical treatments for the disease.

Many newer immunologic therapies are under investigation,
including intravenous immunoglobulins. Other for people with
progressive MS--the forms of the disease that do not have a
pattern of attack and recovery--are underway. Exciting areas
of exploration include laboratory studies on remyelination as
well as the possibility of one day stimulating recovery from
existing damage.

And through the years, life for people with MS has steadily
improved. In 1890, when MS was treated with herbs and
bedrest, life expectancy was five years. By 1970, when
steroids were the major available medication, life expectancy
was about 32 years from time of diagnosis. Today, with an
array of medications and greatly improved nursing care, life
expectancy is essentially normal.

The decade is coming when we will be able to write the final
chapter of this story. The Society will have completed its
mission and MS will be history.

For more information on research directions in MS and the
National MS Society's role in promoting research, please
contact your chapter for a copy of our booklet, Research
Directions in Multiple Sclerosis, or call 1-800-FIGHT-MS
and select option "1" to ask to speak with your chapter's
Research Advocate, a volunteer who will be happy to brief
you on all the latest scientific developments in MS research
and the Society's current research and medical programs.

© National Multiple Sclerosis Society, 1996

News & Information   /   M.S. Index  /  Diagnosing  / Facts   /  Treatment   /   Living With M.S.  /   Symptoms    /  What Course Does M.S. Take  /   Who Gets M.S

 
Planet Mobility Main Menu.!  -  Online Mall

 Help Advanced Search